Following an intervention by the Labour spokesman on media, Ivan Lewis MP (Labour warns Hunt on News Corp), in which he linked the evidence of phone hacking and the erosion of media plurality, the FT concluded that opposition to the News Corp bid for outright control of BSkyB would coalesce around the paramount issue of protecting the public interest.
Commenting on reports of private discussions between News Corp and the Department of Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS), the FT suggested that the former intends to offer concessions, such as the disposal of Sky News, in order to convince the minister, Jeremy Hunt, that it would be unnecessary to follow Ofcom's recommendation and refer the bid to the Competition Commission.
However, the FT was persuaded by a note circulated by Enders Analysis which argued that, even if News Corp was prepared to offer such remedies, DCMS should not accept them without extensive discussion with affected parties. Chris Goodall, author of the note, pointed out that in each of the eight legal precedents for a procedure that allows ministers to accept remedies, such as the disposal of assets, in lieu of a lengthy review by the commission, consultation had been key to the process. “Although Jeremy Hunt is perfectly entitled to negotiate undertakings with News Corp, we think that he would have to then consult with interested parties, and with Ofcom, [the broadcasting regulator] as to whether the undertakings do properly protect against a diminution of plurality”, he added.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1ce2700c-233e-11e0-b6a3-00144feab49a.html#axzz...