Homepage

Enders Analysis provides a subscription research service covering the media, entertainment, mobile and fixed telecommunications industries in Europe, with a special focus on new technologies and media.

Our research is independent and evidence-based, covering all sides of the market: consumers, leading companies, industry trends, forecasts and public policy & regulation. A complete list of our research can be found here.

 

Rigorous Fearless Independent

Streaming giants have been revising their strategies for some time now. For example, they have sought to limit binge-watching (the ability to watch episodes back-to-back) by offering programs on a rolling basis, "to avoid burning through their investments," observes François Godard, an analyst at Enders.

"We're seeing fewer high-end dramas. The market has calmed down," adds François Godard. "For years, we've seen fierce competition, with billions spent to build a subscriber base. But players are increasingly having to face market pressure to become profitable."

According to Enders Analysis, the seven largest players are expected to spend $116.5 billion in 2025, a figure that is virtually unchanged from 2024, "which, in a period of inflation, corresponds to a decrease," notes François Godard. For comparison, it was $131 billion in 2022.

"Fox couldn't stay away from this market, while cable has declined significantly. But it came cautiously: while SVOD players were fighting with billions to win subscribers, Fox was making money," points out François Godard, an analyst at Enders Analysis. Nearly half of Americans watch content via streaming (47.3% according to Nielsen data in July, including YouTube), far ahead of cable (22%) and traditional television ("broadcast") (18%).

"The logic is probably to be more present in packages than in direct subscription sales. And that's where they can be most successful," says François Godard.

Ligue 1+ will now have to prove that it can last. The former M6 boss is aiming for "1 million subscribers" by the end of the season. The coming weeks will be decisive. "It's now or never. After November, we hardly sell any more subscriptions ," says François Godard, an analyst for Enders Analysis. It's also important to retain viewers who haven't signed up for the year. Content broadcast outside of matches will influence the continuation of subscriptions. "The League should be cautious, because by presenting L1+ as a streaming content channel, it risks disappointing ," warns the analyst. However, he believes that the offer remains "better perceived" than DAZN's last year. "There's a patriotic element. The offer seems more legitimate. This could turn fans away from piracy ," he believes.

Spotify's ad-supported tier serves as an important on-ramp for its Premium business — plus the $1.9 billion in ad sales it brought in last year helps toward paying its substantial royalties to music labels and other content creators. However, Premium is the sacred cash cow: Enders Analysis estimates that gross profits for Premium are around 15 to 20 times those of the advertising tier.

 

The history between Canal+ and Ligue 1 is complicated. But the decision to drop pricey Disney rights and instead do a deal with Warner for its Max streaming bundles is a clear sign that the company is paying much more attention to content costs than it did five years ago, said François Godard, an analyst at Enders Analysis. 

At the same time, spending is being concentrated on the biggest sports properties, such as the English Premier League. “Secondary rights [such as Bundesliga and Serie A in France or La Liga in Spain] are attracting far less interest,” said Godard. “They think that people subscribe for the top product and that the rest is only nice to have.”

“Long-term, I do think streamers will take a bigger role in sport. Disney already has deep roots with ESPN and needs to expand reach in Europe,” said Godard. “Sports, especially league-based, are great for reducing churn – people keep coming back. It’s also a way to cross-promote other content.”

Rogan’s interpretation is not quite right: viewers will have to pay to watch UFC fights, but as part of a monthly subscription, rather than through pay-per-view. It is a change of approach that has been coming for some time, according to François Godard, a media and telecoms specialist at Enders Analysis, a UK research house.

“Pay-per-view is perhaps not in terminal decline, but it is vanishing,” he said. “It emerged at a time when consumers were familiar with the idea of renting a tape or a disc of a movie. The public is less open to that now. The concept of renting a piece of content has all but disappeared.”

“There is nothing new here,” said Godard. “This was true of subscription TV, too. If you had to choose one piece of content, you’d choose sports. But the larger story is still one of fragmentation: most of those people who want to watch UFC on Paramount will probably want to watch other sports, and for that they still need other subscriptions.”