Enders is clear: there is nothing the CBI can do to convince her research firm to reinstate the membership that she cancelled in the wake of the allegations.

“I don’t want to wait for any changes. I just fundamentally believe that there is nothing to be gained.”

Furthermore, she said she felt “completely let down” by the lobbying efforts of the CBI, which Enders Analysis joined before the EU referendum in the hope of amplifying the voice of business and influencing trade issues. “They simply did not have influence on government policy. Do they now?”

The government has suspended all official contact with the CBI pending the outcome of the confidence vote.

Alice Enders, a music industry analyst at the London-based Enders Analysis, said that under the watch of Masuch, BMG had “constantly grown” as the former economics student had prioritised sound financial management and taken advantage of the benefits of being owned by the cash-rich Bertelsmann.

“A lot of it is not organic growth — it’s through investment,” she said. But she added that Bertelsmann had “put a lot of money” behind Masuch because of BMG’s “very attractive” earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation margin of more than 22 per cent last year."

Succession has also redefined the notion of TV success. “Its cultural impact is much bigger than its audience,” Tom Standen-Jewell of media consultants Enders Analysis told i.

“You wouldn’t know that Coronation Street has four times the audience of Succession from the critical buzz. But it’s a big marketing tool for HBO and Sky to keep subscribers.”

“Everyone praises the dialogue, which is superbly crafted with a nihilism and nastiness. That craft was honed writing comedies like Peep Show and The Thick of It for Channel 4 and the BBC,” Standen-Jewell said.

“Those themes of cynicism about those in power are now widely shared in the US and UK.”

“Prince Harry is on a mission against what he regards to be a ‘system’ that exists in Britain between the tabloid media and the Royal Household,” said media analyst Alice Enders. “He wishes . . . on principle to wreak as much reputational damage as possible. The money obviously doesn’t matter as much as the mission. Phone hacking has just fallen out of the public eye, and Prince Harry has brought it back to the fore.”

Enders Analysis chief executive Douglas McCabe similarly told Press Gazette he was "absolutely convinced we're not at the ceiling" of the subscriptions market for news publishers.

"I also think publishers underrate the degree to which they control the ceiling," he continued, explaining that the question of whether the market is maxed out "makes an assumption that the market has a natural shape to it that cannot be influenced by the quality of supply. I think that's completely just not true."

For example, he said, The Guardian has never put up a hard paywall but changed its messaging asking people to pay and "gone from a market of nobody buying anything to a market of more than a million people contributing every month."

As a result, he added, The Guardian "moved the ceiling several inches higher" and redefined the market not as a premium subscription industry but one that values journalism more generally.

Twitter Blue to the rescue? In the three months since the $8 per month subscription launched, only 300,000 users have registered, generating a mere $28 million in revenue, according to Enders Analysis. On the horizon is an ad free Twitter Blue (cost to be confirmed) and a gold verification for organisations at $1,000 per month. Neither have generated any revenue to date. But Musk’s masterplan is to turn Twitter into a Chinese-style super-app under the holding company “X Corp” offering messaging, payments and entertainment. But according to Joseph Teasdale, Enders’s head of technology, “it’s a pipe dream”. Twitter has neither the regulatory environment nor demographics which underpinned the success of the Chinese apps that Musk wishes to emulate. He needs the advertisers.