James said “The timing looks linked to Altice’s takeover restrictions lapsing in June, and this may be more a warning about further control being acquired than an objection to the 18 per cent stake per se."

“BT is highly sensitive in national security terms — it does work for a government that it is not allowed to talk about, as well as being crucial for network resilience. I would not expect the government to allow a full takeover or control to pass to a foreign investor.”

Tom believes it is still early days and internal changes can be made to turn the venture around. There could be a number of reasons [for its current performance]," he says. "It could be that it is a bit too brash and lurid for British tastes. It could be that it is not actually differentiated enough amid a crowded market of opinion and debate programmes. It might be that the British public doesn't care about gender neutral toilets as much as Piers Morgan does."

"They will be in a testing phase and it is not the first TV channel that Rupert Murdoch has launched. He will understand that it takes time to build an audience."

Tom said Britons watched on average 8.1 minutes of the channel a day in 2021, compared with 7.9 minutes in 2018. “That might not sound like a massive shift, but the whole industry has dropped about 10 per cent."

He added “Sacrificing younger viewers for older viewers is one of the major reasons for Channel 5’s success — they’re avoiding a demographic that is rapidly lowering its engagement with TV. The question is how sustainable is that? Paramount will be thinking, ‘Maybe by then, everyone will have Paramount Plus and we’ll transfer from the linear [non-streaming] world.’

“With Channel 5, they’re living in the now and squeezing out as much value as they can, while their rivals are transitioning their viewer online at a faster pace.”

James said "Some of them may start to run out of money. They will all have a certain amount of debt funding, and there will be covenants on that debt, which will be the trigger point."

"There is also an issue with consolidation. We are talking about companies that have got significantly less than 300,000 homes passed - some of them less than 50,000. Is it worth doing an acquisition for a company that is just a few weeks build time [for bigger players]? Some of them are just too small to be worth the bother."